James S. Nagel
- Internal Medicine top 5%
-
- Neurological disorders and treatments 2
-
- Organ Donation and Transplantation 2
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 2
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications 1
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 2
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies 1
-
- Blood properties and coagulation 1
-
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 1
- Co-authors
- Samuel Z. GoldhaberMichael F. MeyerovitzDucksoo KimWilliam R. FriedenbergJohn A. HeitCraig M. KesslerThomas D. FaheyMichael Feldstein
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (1 paper)Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (1 paper)American Heart Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James S. Nagel
10 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Internal Medicine 146
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 156
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 34
- Rehabilitation 25
- Neurology 44
Countries citing papers authored by James S. Nagel
This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Nagel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Nagel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Nagel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Nagel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Nagel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Nagel. The network helps show where James S. Nagel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James S. Nagel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 33 | |
| 2 | Procedure guideline for brain death scintigraphy. | 2003 | 28 |
| 3 | 1992 | 151 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 23 | |
| 5 | Technetium-99m-HMPAO cerebral perfusion scintigraphy: considerations for timely brain death declaration. | 1992 | 20 |
| 6 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1976 | 52 |
About James S. Nagel
James S. Nagel is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 10 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (1 paper) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (146 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (156 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34 citations). James S. Nagel has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Michael F. Meyerovitz, Ducksoo Kim, William R. Friedenberg, John A. Heit, Craig M. Kessler, Thomas D. Fahey, Michael Feldstein, David B. Wilson and Andrew P. Selwyn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and American Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.