James R. Priest
- Molecular Biology
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Emmi HelleRonald V. LacroMartina BruecknerSeema MitalMary Ella PierpontVidu GargBruce D. GelbMark W. Russell
- Topics
- Congenital heart defects research (10 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (9 papers)Coronary Artery Anomalies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFinlandChina
In The Last Decade
James R. Priest
21 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Molecular Biology 613
- Epidemiology 469
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 275
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 255
- Surgery 209
Countries citing papers authored by James R. Priest
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Priest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Priest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Priest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Priest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Priest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Priest. The network helps show where James R. Priest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Priest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Priest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Priest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Priest. James R. Priest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 92 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Data | 2 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | Genetic Basis for Congenital Heart Disease: Revisited: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Associationbreakdown → | 370 |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 177 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 121 |
About James R. Priest
James R. Priest is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital heart defects research (10 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (9 papers) and Coronary Artery Anomalies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (469 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (105 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (255 citations). James R. Priest has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and China. Frequent co-authors include Emmi Helle, Ronald V. Lacro, Martina Brueckner, Seema Mital, Mary Ella Pierpont, Vidu Garg, Bruce D. Gelb, Mark W. Russell, Wendy K. Chung and Amy L. McGuire. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Nature Communications and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.