James Pritchett
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Music top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Topics
- Musicology and Musical Analysis (6 papers)Diverse Musicological Studies (5 papers)Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- MusicAnthropologyArcheology
- Journals
- American AnthropologistJournal of the Royal Anthropological InstituteThe International Journal of African Historical Studies
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Pritchett
13 papers receiving 239 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sociology and Political Science 134
- Anthropology 67
- Music 63
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 59
- Political Science and International Relations 39
Countries citing papers authored by James Pritchett
This map shows the geographic impact of James Pritchett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pritchett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pritchett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Pritchett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pritchett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pritchett. The network helps show where James Pritchett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Pritchett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Pritchett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Pritchett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Pritchett. James Pritchett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | Friends for Life, Friends for Death: Cohorts and Consciousness among the Lunda-Ndembu | 6 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 112 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | The Music of John Cage | 89 |
| 12 | Continuity and change in an African society: the Kanongesha Lunda of Mwinilunga, Zambia | 1 |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | The development of chance techniques in the music of John Cage, 1950-1956 | 1 |
| 15 | 2 |
About James Pritchett
James Pritchett is a scholar working on Music, Urban Studies and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 15 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (6 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (5 papers) and Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (63 citations), Anthropology (67 citations) and Archeology (6 citations). James Pritchett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Ferguson, Roy R. Grinker, Kate Crehan and Giacomo Macola. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute and The International Journal of African Historical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.