James Phinney Baxter
About
In The Last Decade
James Phinney Baxter
3 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Political Science and International Relations 45
- Economics and Econometrics 29
- Sociology and Political Science 17
- Physiology 14
- Strategy and Management 9
Countries citing papers authored by James Phinney Baxter
This map shows the geographic impact of James Phinney Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Phinney Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Phinney Baxter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Phinney Baxter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Phinney Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Phinney Baxter. The network helps show where James Phinney Baxter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Phinney Baxter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Phinney Baxter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Phinney Baxter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Phinney Baxter. James Phinney Baxter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 61 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.