James Penner

606 total citations
15 papers, 224 citations indexed

About

James Penner is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, James Penner has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 224 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Law, 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in James Penner's work include Legal principles and applications (5 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). James Penner is often cited by papers focused on Legal principles and applications (5 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). James Penner collaborates with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United States. James Penner's co-authors include Devi R. Gnyawalị, Weiguo Fan, Richard Nobles, David Schiff, Michael Otsuka, Benjamin Wong and Wayne A. Morrison and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Systems Research, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations and Modern Law Review.

In The Last Decade

James Penner

12 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Penner Singapore 5 79 63 40 38 37 15 224
Falk Ebinger Germany 10 80 1.0× 19 0.3× 157 3.9× 49 1.3× 12 0.3× 31 303
Richard Calland South Africa 9 139 1.8× 51 0.8× 79 2.0× 18 0.5× 11 0.3× 26 251
Saar Alon‐Barkat Israel 8 100 1.3× 13 0.2× 74 1.9× 49 1.3× 10 0.3× 14 285
David Banisar United Kingdom 7 157 2.0× 60 1.0× 95 2.4× 37 1.0× 21 0.6× 21 269
Cynthia R. Farina United States 11 33 0.4× 32 0.5× 95 2.4× 44 1.2× 11 0.3× 47 270
Nathan Mnjama Botswana 9 57 0.7× 25 0.4× 55 1.4× 12 0.3× 19 0.5× 49 322
Archil Chochia Estonia 9 44 0.6× 24 0.4× 74 1.9× 18 0.5× 5 0.1× 26 181
Bruce L. Hay United States 10 18 0.2× 107 1.7× 17 0.4× 67 1.8× 15 0.4× 16 303
Francesco Contini Italy 9 63 0.8× 69 1.1× 142 3.5× 58 1.5× 8 0.2× 29 243
Larry A. DiMatteo United States 8 21 0.3× 89 1.4× 72 1.8× 65 1.7× 4 0.1× 57 227

Countries citing papers authored by James Penner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Penner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Penner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Penner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Penner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Penner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Penner. The network helps show where James Penner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Penner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Penner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Penner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Penner. James Penner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Penner, James. (2021). Justifying (or Not) the Office of Trusteeship With Particular Reference to Massively Discretionary Trusts. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence. 34(2). 365–390.
2.
Penner, James. (2019). From personal life to private law. Jurisprudence. 10(2). 300–312. 3 indexed citations
3.
Penner, James, et al.. (2019). The Basics of Private and Public Data Trusts. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
4.
Penner, James. (2019). As If We Were Strangers: From Social Life to Private Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Penner, James & Michael Otsuka. (2018). Property Theory : Legal and Political Perspectives. 4 indexed citations
6.
Penner, James. (2018). We All Make Mistakes: A ‘Duty of Virtue’ Theory of Restitutionary Liability for Mistaken Payments. Modern Law Review. 81(2). 222–246. 4 indexed citations
7.
Penner, James. (2014). The Law of Trusts. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
8.
Penner, James, et al.. (2012). McCoubrey & White's Textbook on Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
9.
Penner, James. (2010). The State Duty to Support the Poor in Kant's Doctrine of Right. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 12(1). 88–110. 9 indexed citations
10.
Gnyawalị, Devi R., Weiguo Fan, & James Penner. (2010). Competitive Actions and Dynamics in the Digital Age: An Empirical Investigation of Social Networking Firms. Information Systems Research. 21(3). 594–613. 100 indexed citations
11.
Penner, James. (2008). Property, Community, and the Problem of Distributive Justice. Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 10(1). 193–216. 4 indexed citations
12.
Penner, James, David Schiff, & Richard Nobles. (2005). Introduction to Jurisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and Materials. 8 indexed citations
13.
Morrison, Wayne A., et al.. (2004). Jurisprudence & Legal Theory. 1 indexed citations
14.
Penner, James. (2000). The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford University Press eBooks. 81 indexed citations
15.
Penner, James. (1995). Book Reviews : Margaret Jane Radin, Reinterpreting Property. Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press,1993, 265 pp. Social & Legal Studies. 4(3). 426–428. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026