James P. O’Connor

35 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

James P. O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 88
  • Clinical Psychology 122
  • Applied Psychology 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 43
Replace P. B. HITCHCOCK with:
P. B. HITCHCOCK United Kingdom
Claire Cassidy United Kingdom
Gemma Garrido Spain
Thomas Douglas United Kingdom
David W. Jones United Kingdom
R. Malatesha Joshi United States
Pierre Potvin Canada
Lijuan Wang China
Jonathan Sutton United Kingdom
Eva Neumann Germany
James P. O’Connor relative to P. B. HITCHCOCK United Kingdom P. B. HITCHCOCK's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
P. B. HITCHCOCK · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James P. O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James P. O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James P. O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James P. O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James P. O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James P. O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James P. O’Connor. The network helps show where James P. O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James P. O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James P. O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together James P. O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196094
2 196150
3 195642
4 195442
5 202141
6 202336
7 195536
8 198027
9 197927
10 202126
11 202220
12 195615
13 195713
14 195712
15 201411
16 195911
17 196210
18 202310
19 20199
20 20238

About James P. O’Connor

James P. O’Connor is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Clinical Psychology, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 35 papers that have together received 601 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (122 citations), Applied Psychology (27 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (43 citations). James P. O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Maurice Lorr, John W. Stafford, Michael R. Wasielewski, Ryan M. Young, Jonathan D. Schultz, Robert C. Ryan, Charles U. Pittman, Thomas E. Hanlon, Taeyeon Kim and John K. McGee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of General Psychology and Educational and Psychological Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact