L. Petersen

1.4k citations
16 papers · 1.1k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

L. Petersen

16 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

L. Petersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 425
  • Philosophy 165
  • Clinical Psychology 255
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Social Psychology 108
Replace Claire Frederick with:
Claire Frederick United States
Jan Čermák Czechia
A Lévy Israel
Fiona Foley Australia
Jessica Wong China
D. Pucci Italy
SARAH EVERTS Canada
Jonathan Sutton United Kingdom
Mukesh Kumar Swami India
Helmut Hoffmann Germany
L. Petersen relative to Claire Frederick United States Claire Frederick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Claire Frederick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Petersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Petersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Petersen. The network helps show where L. Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Petersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Petersen Line = papers co-authored together L. Petersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2002235
2 2006199
3 2009150
4 2005123
5 200892
6 201669
7 202054
8 202146
9 200938
10 202033
11 200730
12 201314
13 200610
14 20076
15 20062
16 20071

About L. Petersen

L. Petersen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Philosophy and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (2 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (425 citations), Philosophy (165 citations), Clinical Psychology (255 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). L. Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gertrud Krarup, Anne Amalie Elgaard Thorup, Merete Nordentoft, Pia Jeppesen, Kurt V. Gothelf, Nils Jakob Vest Hansen, P. Jørgensen, M. Abel, Peter Blakskjær and Flemming Besenbacher. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Journal of the American Chemical Society, European Psychiatry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Progress in medicinal chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact