James N. Ingram
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Motor Control and Adaptation 27
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 6
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 5
- Neural dynamics and brain function 4
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 4
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Action Observation and Synchronization 17
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 13
-
- Robot Manipulation and Learning 4
- Co-authors
- Daniel M. WolpertIan S. HowardKonrad P. KördingMartin VossPatrick HaggardJ. Randall FlanaganDavid W. FranklinMichael N. Shadlen
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James N. Ingram
33 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Social Psychology 486
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 102
- Rehabilitation 91
- Human-Computer Interaction 67
Countries citing papers authored by James N. Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of James N. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James N. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James N. Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James N. Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James N. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James N. Ingram. The network helps show where James N. Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James N. Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 67 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 59 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 167 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 88 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 229 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 169 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 47 |
About James N. Ingram
James N. Ingram is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (27 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (17 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Social Psychology (486 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (102 citations). James N. Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel M. Wolpert, Ian S. Howard, Konrad P. Körding, Martin Voss, Patrick Haggard, J. Randall Flanagan, David W. Franklin, Michael N. Shadlen, Christoph Teufel and Paul C. Fletcher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Current Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.