James N. Ingram
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Daniel M. WolpertIan S. HowardKonrad P. KördingMartin VossPatrick HaggardJ. Randall FlanaganDavid W. FranklinMichael N. Shadlen
- Topics
- Motor Control and Adaptation (27 papers)Action Observation and Synchronization (17 papers)Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James N. Ingram
33 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Biomedical Engineering 537
- Social Psychology 486
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 102
Countries citing papers authored by James N. Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of James N. Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James N. Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James N. Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James N. Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James N. Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James N. Ingram. The network helps show where James N. Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James N. Ingram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James N. Ingram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James N. Ingram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James N. Ingram. James N. Ingram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 167 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 88 | |
| 18 | 229 | |
| 19 | 169 | |
| 20 | 47 |
About James N. Ingram
James N. Ingram is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (27 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (17 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Social Psychology (486 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (102 citations). James N. Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel M. Wolpert, Ian S. Howard, Konrad P. Körding, Martin Voss, Patrick Haggard, J. Randall Flanagan, David W. Franklin, Michael N. Shadlen, Christoph Teufel and Paul C. Fletcher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Nature Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.