James N. Bow

892 total citations
32 papers, 626 citations indexed

About

James N. Bow is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Demography. According to data from OpenAlex, James N. Bow has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 626 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in Clinical Psychology and 12 papers in Demography. Recurrent topics in James N. Bow's work include Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers). James N. Bow is often cited by papers focused on Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers). James N. Bow collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. James N. Bow's co-authors include Francella A. Quinnell, James R. Flens, Jonathan W. Gould, Paul Boxer, Michael C. Gottlieb, Craig N. Karson, Terry E. Goldberg, Jennifer A. Erickson Cornish, Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez and Pamela S. Ludolph and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Journal of Learning Disabilities.

In The Last Decade

James N. Bow

31 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James N. Bow United States 14 320 312 271 120 96 32 626
Marion F. Ehrenberg Canada 15 307 1.0× 240 0.8× 192 0.7× 229 1.9× 26 0.3× 25 599
Arnold L. Stolberg United States 18 366 1.1× 431 1.4× 503 1.9× 230 1.9× 33 0.3× 34 838
Diogo Lamela Portugal 16 306 1.0× 247 0.8× 276 1.0× 192 1.6× 21 0.2× 54 654
Kathryn Kuehnle United States 11 293 0.9× 220 0.7× 130 0.5× 114 0.9× 19 0.2× 16 522
Neil Kalter United States 18 485 1.5× 483 1.5× 454 1.7× 224 1.9× 25 0.3× 42 962
Layne D. Bennion United States 9 241 0.8× 315 1.0× 207 0.8× 199 1.7× 14 0.1× 16 713
Susan S. Chuang Canada 15 445 1.4× 280 0.9× 90 0.3× 197 1.6× 28 0.3× 37 751
JoAnne L. Pedro‐Carroll United States 17 501 1.6× 399 1.3× 446 1.6× 173 1.4× 15 0.2× 23 906
Shayne R. Anderson United States 13 409 1.3× 166 0.5× 119 0.4× 378 3.1× 34 0.4× 61 645
Marcia L. Michaels United States 12 463 1.4× 220 0.7× 96 0.4× 190 1.6× 17 0.2× 16 694

Countries citing papers authored by James N. Bow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James N. Bow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James N. Bow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James N. Bow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James N. Bow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James N. Bow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James N. Bow. The network helps show where James N. Bow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James N. Bow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James N. Bow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James N. Bow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James N. Bow. James N. Bow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bow, James N. & Michael C. Gottlieb. (2021). On developing a child custody practice.. Practice Innovations. 6(4). 263–274. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ackerman, Marc J., et al.. (2021). Child custody evaluation practices: Where we were, where we are, and where we are going.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 52(4). 406–417. 10 indexed citations
3.
Austin, William G., et al.. (2016). Relocation Issues in Child Custody Evaluations: A Survey of Professionals. Family Court Review. 54(3). 477–486. 7 indexed citations
4.
Rodríguez, Melanie M. Domenech, et al.. (2014). Ethics education in professional psychology: A survey of American Psychological Association accredited programs.. Training and Education in Professional Psychology. 8(4). 241–247. 21 indexed citations
5.
Bow, James N., et al.. (2011). ATTORNEYS' BELIEFS AND OPINIONS ABOUT CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS. Family Court Review. 49(2). 301–312. 9 indexed citations
6.
Bow, James N.. (2010). Use of third party information in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 28(4). 511–521. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bow, James N., James R. Flens, & Jonathan W. Gould. (2010). MMPI-2 and MCMI-III in Forensic Evaluations: A Survey of Psychologists. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 10(1). 37–52. 19 indexed citations
8.
Bow, James N. & David A. Martindale. (2009). Developing and Managing a Child Custody Practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 9(2). 127–137. 6 indexed citations
9.
Bow, James N., Jonathan W. Gould, & James R. Flens. (2009). Examining Parental Alienation in Child Custody Cases: A Survey of Mental Health and Legal Professionals. American Journal of Family Therapy. 37(2). 127–145. 41 indexed citations
10.
Bow, James N.. (2006). Review of Empirical Research on Child Custody Practice. Journal of Child Custody. 3(1). 23–50. 18 indexed citations
11.
Bow, James N., et al.. (2006). An Analysis of Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II/III in Child Custody Evaluations. Journal of Child Custody. 2(4). 1–22. 13 indexed citations
12.
Bow, James N., et al.. (2005). Forensic Evaluation of Internet Sexual Activity. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 5(2). 1–29. 2 indexed citations
13.
Bow, James N. & Paul Boxer. (2003). Assessing Allegations of Domestic Violence in Child Custody Evaluations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 18(12). 1394–1410. 44 indexed citations
14.
Bow, James N., et al.. (2002). Assessment of sexual abuse allegations in child custody cases.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 33(6). 566–575. 5 indexed citations
15.
Bow, James N. & Francella A. Quinnell. (2002). A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION REPORTS. Family Court Review. 40(2). 164–176. 46 indexed citations
16.
Bow, James N., et al.. (2002). Assessment of sexual abuse allegations in child custody cases.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 33(6). 566–575. 43 indexed citations
17.
Quinnell, Francella A. & James N. Bow. (2001). Psychological tests used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 19(4). 491–501. 69 indexed citations
18.
Bow, James N. & Francella A. Quinnell. (2001). Psychologists' current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after American Psychological Association guidelines.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 32(3). 261–268. 110 indexed citations
19.
Bow, James N.. (1988). A Comparison of Intellectually Superior Male Reading Achievers and Underachievers from A Neuropsychological Perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 21(2). 118–123. 4 indexed citations
20.
Bow, James N.. (1988). Treating resistant children. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 5(1). 3–15. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026