James Monaco

1.0k citations
37 papers · 761 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

James Monaco

35 papers receiving 747 citations

Peers

James Monaco
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Biophysics 138
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 345
  • Artificial Intelligence 524
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 244
Replace André Homeyer with:
André Homeyer Germany
Monjoy Saha India
Olcay Sertel United States
Daniel Heim Germany
Eduardo Castro Portugal
Dimitris Glotsos Greece
Yee‐Wah Tsang United Kingdom
Żaneta Świderska-Chadaj Poland
Ruchika Verma United States
Oscar Geessink Netherlands
James Monaco relative to André Homeyer Germany André Homeyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
André Homeyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Monaco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Monaco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Monaco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Monaco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Monaco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Monaco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Monaco. The network helps show where James Monaco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Monaco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Monaco Line = papers co-authored together James Monaco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009207
2 201090
3 201156
4 201152
5 200932
6 201029
7 201226
8 200926
9 201223
10 201019
11 201115
12 201115
13 202014
14 201213
15 200912
16 201212
17 200811
18 201210
19 201010
20 20189

About James Monaco

James Monaco is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 37 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (20 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (11 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (5 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers) and Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (138 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (345 citations), Artificial Intelligence (524 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (244 citations). James Monaco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anant Madabhushi, Michael D. Feldman, Ajay Basavanhally, Shridar Ganesan, Gyan Bhanot, J E Tomaszewski, Shannon C. Agner, Scott Doyle, John Tomaszewski and Ulysses J. Balis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pathology Informatics, Analytical Cellular Pathology, Medical Image Analysis, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) and IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact