James McClenon
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- William Sims BainbridgeWilliam H. SwatosRon WestrumMohammad KhodayarifardCarl L. BankstonMiguel RoigJennifer NooneyMatthew D. Smith
- Topics
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (16 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAcademic Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesIran
In The Last Decade
James McClenon
28 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Social Psychology 220
- Philosophy 111
- Health 99
- Sociology and Political Science 83
- Clinical Psychology 65
Countries citing papers authored by James McClenon
This map shows the geographic impact of James McClenon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James McClenon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James McClenon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James McClenon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James McClenon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James McClenon. The network helps show where James McClenon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James McClenon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James McClenon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James McClenon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James McClenon. James McClenon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | A community survey of anomalous experiences: Correlational analysis of evolutionary hypotheses. | 1 |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | The Coverage of Parapsychology in Introductory Psychology Textbooks: 1990-2002 | 2 |
| 7 | For personal use only--not for reproduction | 2 |
| 8 | Content Analysis of an Anomalous Experience Collection: Evaluating Evolutionary Perspectives | 5 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | Spiritual healing and folklore research: evaluating the hypnosis/placebo theory. | 3 |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | Social science and anomalous experience: paradigms for investigating sporadic social phenomena | 3 |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About James McClenon
James McClenon is a scholar working on Philosophy, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (16 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (15 citations), Health (99 citations) and Social Psychology (220 citations). James McClenon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include William Sims Bainbridge, William H. Swatos, Ron Westrum, Mohammad Khodayarifard, Carl L. Bankston, Miguel Roig, Jennifer Nooney and Matthew D. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.