James M. Osborne

3.7k citations
73 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 23
Topics
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (20 papers)Cancer Cells and Metastasis (15 papers)Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (15 papers)
Journals
Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE

In The Last Decade

James M. Osborne

70 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

James M. Osborne
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Molecular Biology 776
  • Cell Biology 612
  • Biomedical Engineering 407
  • Modeling and Simulation 370
  • Oncology 346
Replace Alexander G. Fletcher with:
Alexander G. Fletcher United Kingdom
Joe Pitt‐Francis United Kingdom
Yi Jiang United States
Trachette L. Jackson United States
Mike Partridge United Kingdom
Arpita Upadhyaya United States
Julio M. Belmonte United States
Mohammad Kohandel Canada
Patrick Müller United States
Roeland M. H. Merks Netherlands
James M. Osborne relative to Alexander G. Fletcher United Kingdom Alexander G. Fletcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexander G. Fletcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Osborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Osborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Osborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Osborne. The network helps show where James M. Osborne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Osborne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Osborne. James M. Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 2
5 4
6 1
7 3
8 49
9 149
10 16
11 65
12 142
13 19
14 75
15 8
16 28
17 35
18 11
19 8
20 77

About James M. Osborne

James M. Osborne is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Aging and Cell Biology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (20 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (15 papers) and Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (370 citations), Cell Biology (612 citations) and Aging (24 citations). James M. Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Gavaghan, Alexander G. Fletcher, Joe Pitt‐Francis, Philip K. Maini, Yohan Davit, Helen M. Byrne, Pras Pathmanathan, Gary R. Mirams, Jonathan Cooper and Sara-Jane Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026