Philip J. Murray

42 total papers · 1.6k total citations
24 papers, 943 citations indexed

About

Philip J. Murray is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip J. Murray has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 943 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Cell Biology and 6 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Philip J. Murray's work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers) and Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (5 papers). Philip J. Murray is often cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers) and Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (5 papers). Philip J. Murray collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Philip J. Murray's co-authors include Philip K. Maini, Ruth E. Baker, Maksim V. Plikus, Chih-Chiang Chen, Cheng‐Ming Chuong, Marcus J. Tindall, Randall B. Widelitz, Carina M. Edwards, Ting Jiang and Oscar K. Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Genes & Development and Development.

In The Last Decade

Philip J. Murray

23 papers receiving 922 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip J. Murray 446 294 169 123 113 24 943
John C. Dallon 220 0.5× 533 1.8× 26 0.2× 248 2.0× 104 0.9× 35 1.2k
Julio M. Belmonte 451 1.0× 445 1.5× 15 0.1× 142 1.2× 131 1.2× 21 1.1k
Takaki Yamamoto 387 0.9× 204 0.7× 45 0.3× 3 0.0× 122 1.1× 27 888
Kaori Ide 708 1.6× 63 0.2× 10 0.1× 17 0.1× 87 0.8× 53 1.1k
Avner Friedman 275 0.6× 90 0.3× 12 0.1× 167 1.4× 129 1.1× 26 835
Mercedes Rodríguez 684 1.5× 293 1.0× 13 0.1× 4 0.0× 247 2.2× 32 1.2k
B. Angermann 362 0.8× 122 0.4× 5 0.0× 16 0.1× 143 1.3× 25 1.2k
Arun Subramaniam 467 1.0× 102 0.3× 76 0.4× 78 0.7× 27 1.0k
Dagmar Hildebrand 435 1.0× 194 0.7× 27 0.2× 2 0.0× 234 2.1× 36 1.1k
Adib Keikhosravi 181 0.4× 170 0.6× 27 0.2× 5 0.0× 206 1.8× 34 922

Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Murray. The network helps show where Philip J. Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Murray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Murray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Murray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Murray. Philip J. Murray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026