James Longenbach
Impact in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- French Literature and Poetry
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
Papers in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 7
- French Literature and Poetry 3
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 2
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 1
- Music 1
- Music History and Culture 1
- Co-authors
- Ezra Pound (1 shared paper)A. Walton Litz (1 shared paper)Michael Wood (2 shared papers)Christopher Innes (2 shared papers)Sara Blair (2 shared papers)Marianne DeKoven (2 shared papers)David Trotter (2 shared papers)Michael Levenson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Literature (2 papers)ELH (2 papers)PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1 paper)The New England Quarterly (1 paper)The Yale Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Longenbach
9 papers receiving 49 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Literature and Literary Theory 81
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
- Music 6
- History 13
- Philosophy 13
Countries citing papers authored by James Longenbach
This map shows the geographic impact of James Longenbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Longenbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Longenbach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Longenbach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Longenbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Longenbach. The network helps show where James Longenbach may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside James Longenbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ezra Pound's poetry and prose : contributions to periodicals | 1991 | 17 |
| 2 | 1999 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 4 | Modern poetry after modernism | 1997 | 13 |
| 5 | 1988 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 0 |
About James Longenbach
James Longenbach is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Music, History, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 115 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (7 papers), French Literature and Poetry (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), American Literature and Culture (1 paper), Music History and Culture (1 paper) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (81 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations), Music (6 citations), History (13 citations) and Philosophy (13 citations). James Longenbach has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ezra Pound, A. Walton Litz, Michael Wood, Christopher Innes, Sara Blair, Marianne DeKoven, David Trotter, Michael Levenson, Glen MacLeod and Michael Bell. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, ELH, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, The New England Quarterly and The Yale Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.