James Larimer

769 total citations
38 papers, 617 citations indexed

About

James Larimer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Media Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Larimer has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 617 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Media Technology. Recurrent topics in James Larimer's work include Color Science and Applications (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (7 papers). James Larimer is often cited by papers focused on Color Science and Applications (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (7 papers). James Larimer collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. James Larimer's co-authors include Carol M. Cicerone, David H. Krantz, Thomas P. Piantanida, Edward N. Pugh, A. J. Ahumada, Misha Pavel, Albert J. Ahumada, Jeffrey Lubin, David C. Foyle and James Arbuckle and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series and Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

James Larimer

34 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Larimer United States 13 425 316 277 79 56 38 617
William McIlhagga United Kingdom 14 541 1.3× 256 0.8× 165 0.6× 141 1.8× 32 0.6× 22 715
Allen Poirson United States 13 534 1.3× 295 0.9× 144 0.5× 213 2.7× 58 1.0× 18 758
Mark W. Cannon United States 12 715 1.7× 267 0.8× 98 0.4× 139 1.8× 43 0.8× 23 813
R. Frank Quick United States 8 673 1.6× 262 0.8× 99 0.4× 110 1.4× 42 0.8× 14 807
Ian R. Moorhead United Kingdom 8 344 0.8× 152 0.5× 74 0.3× 165 2.1× 68 1.2× 15 557
Hans Brettel France 15 547 1.3× 424 1.3× 177 0.6× 385 4.9× 94 1.7× 45 1.0k
G. J. Burton United Kingdom 10 501 1.2× 219 0.7× 83 0.3× 179 2.3× 74 1.3× 16 698
Floris L. van Nes Netherlands 8 598 1.4× 211 0.7× 113 0.4× 149 1.9× 74 1.3× 24 884
Jozef Cohen United States 8 355 0.8× 604 1.9× 273 1.0× 334 4.2× 97 1.7× 13 919
Ethan D. Montag United States 15 218 0.5× 267 0.8× 187 0.7× 186 2.4× 57 1.0× 35 541

Countries citing papers authored by James Larimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Larimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Larimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Larimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Larimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Larimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Larimer. The network helps show where James Larimer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Larimer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Larimer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Larimer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Larimer. James Larimer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brill, Michael H. & James Larimer. (2005). Avoiding on‐screen metamerism in N‐primary displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 13(6). 509–516. 8 indexed citations
2.
Larimer, James, et al.. (2004). Display characterization by eye: contrast ratio and discrimination throughout the grayscale. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5292. 218–218. 3 indexed citations
3.
Larimer, James, et al.. (2003). 31:3 Judder‐Induced Edge Flicker at Zero Spatial Contrast. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 34(1). 1042–1043. 1 indexed citations
4.
Larimer, James, et al.. (2001). 41.2: Judder‐Induced Edge Flicker in Moving Objects. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 32(1). 1094–1097. 17 indexed citations
5.
Larimer, James, et al.. (1998). <title>Error diffusion using the web-safe colors: how good is it across platforms?</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3299. 368–375. 4 indexed citations
6.
Larimer, James, et al.. (1997). <title>Improving the appearance of flat-panel displays using multilevel color error diffusion</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3016. 154–167. 1 indexed citations
7.
Peli, Eli, et al.. (1996). Vision Modes for Target Detection Recognition. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 4(3). 145–146.
8.
Jackson, Warren B., et al.. (1996). <title>X-ray image system design using a human visual model</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2708. 29–40. 12 indexed citations
9.
Lubin, Jeffrey, et al.. (1995). <title>Evaluation of image compression artifacts with ViDEOS: a CAD system for LCD color display design and testing</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2411. 74–82. 3 indexed citations
10.
Curtin, Christopher R., et al.. (1994). Display technologies in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus.
11.
Samadani, Ramin, et al.. (1994). <title>Gray-scale/resolution tradeoff</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2179. 47–59. 4 indexed citations
12.
Arend, Lawrence E., et al.. (1994). Color Breakup In Sequentially-Scanned LC Displays. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 3 indexed citations
13.
Nerger, Janice L., Thomas P. Piantanida, & James Larimer. (1993). Color appearance of filled-in backgrounds affects hue cancellation, but not detection thresholds. Vision Research. 33(2). 165–172. 13 indexed citations
14.
Piantanida, Thomas P., et al.. (1992). Studies of the field-of-view/resolution tradeoff in virtual-reality systems. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1666. 448–448. 13 indexed citations
15.
Arditi, Aries, et al.. (1992). Visualization and Modeling of Factors Influencing Visibility in Computer-Aided Crewstation Design. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 3 indexed citations
16.
Larimer, James & Thomas P. Piantanida. (1988). The Impact Of Boundaries On Color: Stabilized Image Studies. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 901. 241–241. 33 indexed citations
17.
Larimer, James, et al.. (1987). CFF depends on color appearance. Annual Meeting Optical Society of America. THX3–THX3. 1 indexed citations
18.
Shevell, Steven K., et al.. (1984). Color perception under chromatic adaptation: “Supersensitivity” with dim backgrounds. Vision Research. 24(5). 491–495. 2 indexed citations
19.
Cicerone, Carol M., David H. Krantz, & James Larimer. (1975). Opponent-process additivity—III. Vision Research. 15(10). 1125–1135. 61 indexed citations
20.
Larimer, James, David H. Krantz, & Carol M. Cicerone. (1974). Opponent-process additivity-I: Red/green equilibria. Vision Research. 14(11). 1127–1140. 131 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William McIlhagga Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Allen Poirson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark W. Cannon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Frank Quick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ian R. Moorhead Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hans Brettel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. J. Burton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Floris L. van Nes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jozef Cohen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ethan D. Montag
Rankless by CCL
2026