James Kurz

753 total citations
9 papers, 511 citations indexed

About

James Kurz is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, James Kurz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 511 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in James Kurz's work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). James Kurz is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). James Kurz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Hungary. James Kurz's co-authors include Lisa J. Staton, Eric I. Rosenberg, Ian Chen, Inginia Genao, Alex J. Mechaber, Mukta Panda, Mark Pasanen, Sam Cykert, Diane Calleson and Charles Faselis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

James Kurz

9 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Kurz United States	7	189	126	117	95	78	9	511
Jane O’Rorke United States	7	181 1.0×	139 1.1×	134 1.1×	26 0.3×	78 1.0×	10	415
Patricia Bruckenthal United States	13	154 0.8×	186 1.5×	207 1.8×	26 0.3×	99 1.3×	33	565
Fiona Hodson United Kingdom	12	258 1.4×	50 0.4×	81 0.7×	265 2.8×	77 1.0×	24	606
Andreas Köpf Germany	16	199 1.1×	166 1.3×	138 1.2×	43 0.5×	102 1.3×	43	707
Malcolm Hogg Australia	13	99 0.5×	144 1.1×	246 2.1×	31 0.3×	108 1.4×	23	501
Adele Spegman United States	10	120 0.6×	44 0.3×	100 0.9×	16 0.2×	47 0.6×	13	372
Davida De La Harpe Ireland	10	74 0.4×	53 0.4×	156 1.3×	143 1.5×	44 0.6×	19	457
Mark Pasanen United States	7	172 0.9×	127 1.0×	115 1.0×	9 0.1×	75 1.0×	9	395
Elspeth E. Shipton New Zealand	7	159 0.8×	100 0.8×	89 0.8×	13 0.1×	76 1.0×	10	397
Beth DeRonne United States	7	381 2.0×	270 2.1×	331 2.8×	18 0.2×	78 1.0×	12	697

Countries citing papers authored by James Kurz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Kurz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kurz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kurz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Kurz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kurz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kurz. The network helps show where James Kurz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Kurz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Kurz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Kurz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Kurz. James Kurz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Staton, Lisa J., Inginia Genao, Mukta Panda, et al.. (2021). When race matters: disagreement in pain perception between patients and their physicians in primary care.. PubMed. 99(5). 532–8. 52 indexed citations

2.

Ramm, Cassandra J., et al.. (2019). HANDHELD ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY BY PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS TO SCREEN FOR VALVULAR HEART DISEASE: A PILOT STUDY. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 73(9). 2007–2007. 5 indexed citations

3.

Roth, Mary T., et al.. (2013). Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning: Optimizing Medication Use in Older Adults in the Primary Care Setting. Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 33(8). 787–797. 40 indexed citations

4.

Kurz, James, et al.. (2010). A Bank the Poor Can Call Their Own. Innovations Technology Governance Globalization. 5(4). 13–32. 1 indexed citations

5.

Rosenberg, Eric I., Inginia Genao, Ian Chen, et al.. (2008). Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use by Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain. Pain Medicine. 9(8). 1065–1072. 104 indexed citations

6.

Panda, Mukta, Lisa J. Staton, Ian Chen, et al.. (2006). The Influence of Discordance in Pain Assessment on the Functional Status of Patients with Chronic Nonmalignant Pain. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 332(1). 18–23. 14 indexed citations

7.

Chen, Ian, James Kurz, Mark Pasanen, et al.. (2005). Racial differences in opioid use for chronic nonmalignant pain. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 20(7). 593–598. 97 indexed citations

8.

Chen, Ian, James Kurz, Mark Pasanen, et al.. (2005). Racial differences in opioid use for chronic nonmalignant pain.. PubMed. 20(7). 593–8. 107 indexed citations

9.

Jenkins, J. Stephen, Greg C. Flaker, Leigh Ann Price, et al.. (1994). Causes of higher in-hospital mortality in women than in men after acute myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 73(5). 319–322. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact