James K. Thompson

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
92 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

James K. Thompson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, James K. Thompson has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 26 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 9 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in James K. Thompson's work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (50 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (30 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (26 papers). James K. Thompson is often cited by papers focused on Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (50 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (30 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (26 papers). James K. Thompson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. James K. Thompson's co-authors include Joshua M. Weiner, Justin Bohnet, Zilong Chen, Ana María Rey, Vladan Vuletić, Murray Holland, Matthew A. Norcia, Kevin C. Cox, Julia Cline and David E. Pritchard and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

James K. Thompson

87 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ense... 2024 2026 2024 10 20 30 40 50

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James K. Thompson United States 27 2.5k 1.2k 187 171 168 92 2.9k
Martin Weitz Germany 36 4.1k 1.6× 711 0.6× 399 2.1× 321 1.9× 621 3.7× 116 4.4k
Arnaud Landragin France 33 3.4k 1.3× 308 0.3× 218 1.2× 50 0.3× 147 0.9× 87 3.9k
Steven R. Jefferts United States 24 2.9k 1.2× 527 0.5× 336 1.8× 60 0.4× 72 0.4× 107 3.1k
Erling Riis United Kingdom 32 3.5k 1.4× 668 0.6× 707 3.8× 90 0.5× 183 1.1× 146 3.8k
G. Birkl Germany 29 2.5k 1.0× 881 0.8× 157 0.8× 78 0.5× 220 1.3× 82 2.7k
Yvan R. P. Sortais France 25 2.0k 0.8× 699 0.6× 207 1.1× 84 0.5× 51 0.3× 49 2.3k
Kai Bongs United Kingdom 35 5.1k 2.1× 434 0.4× 190 1.0× 56 0.3× 906 5.4× 110 5.5k
G. Brida Italy 31 2.1k 0.8× 1.8k 1.5× 417 2.2× 21 0.1× 200 1.2× 136 2.9k
Chr. Tamm Germany 26 3.1k 1.2× 125 0.1× 359 1.9× 229 1.3× 209 1.2× 49 3.4k
Davide Calonico Italy 26 2.0k 0.8× 308 0.3× 635 3.4× 51 0.3× 34 0.2× 108 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by James K. Thompson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Thompson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James K. Thompson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Thompson. The network helps show where James K. Thompson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James K. Thompson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James K. Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James K. Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James K. Thompson. James K. Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rey, Ana María, et al.. (2025). Realization of three- and four-body interactions between momentum states in a cavity. Science. 390(6776). 925–929. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schäfer, Vera M., et al.. (2025). Many-Body Gap Protection against Motional Dephasing of an Optical Clock Transition. Physical Review Letters. 134(11). 113403–113403.
3.
Schäfer, Vera M., et al.. (2025). Continuous recoil-driven lasing and cavity frequency pinning with laser-cooled atoms. Nature Physics. 21(6). 902–908.
4.
Cline, Julia, et al.. (2025). Continuous Collective Strong Coupling of Strontium Atoms to a High Finesse Ring Cavity. Physical Review Letters. 134(1). 13403–13403. 4 indexed citations
5.
Young, Dylan J., Diego Barberena, Vera M. Schäfer, et al.. (2025). Time-Resolved Spectral Gap Spectroscopy in a Quantum Simulator of Fermionic Superfluidity inside an Optical Cavity. Physical Review Letters. 134(18). 183404–183404.
6.
Rey, Ana María, et al.. (2025). Hamiltonian engineering of collective XYZ spin models in an optical cavity. Nature Physics. 21(6). 916–923. 3 indexed citations
7.
Young, Dylan J., Diego Barberena, Vera M. Schäfer, et al.. (2024). Observing dynamical phases of BCS superconductors in a cavity QED simulator. Nature. 625(7996). 679–684. 22 indexed citations
8.
Reilly, J., et al.. (2024). Entangled matter waves for quantum enhanced sensing. Physical review. A. 110(4). 3 indexed citations
9.
Sundar, Bhuvanesh, Diego Barberena, Asier Piñeiro Orioli, et al.. (2023). Bosonic Pair Production and Squeezing for Optical Phase Measurements in Long-Lived Dipoles Coupled to a Cavity. Physical Review Letters. 130(11). 113202–113202. 11 indexed citations
10.
Polloreno, Anthony, et al.. (2023). Opportunities and Limitations in Broadband Sensing. Physical Review Applied. 19(1). 1 indexed citations
11.
Bartolotta, John P., Simon B. Jäger, J. Reilly, et al.. (2022). Entropy transfer from a quantum particle to a classical coherent light field. Physical Review Research. 4(1). 1 indexed citations
12.
Lewis-Swan, Robert J., Diego Barberena, Julia Cline, et al.. (2021). Cavity-QED Quantum Simulator of Dynamical Phases of a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer Superconductor. Physical Review Letters. 126(17). 173601–173601. 23 indexed citations
13.
Muniz, Juan A., Dylan J. Young, Julia Cline, & James K. Thompson. (2021). Cavity-QED measurements of the Sr87 millihertz optical clock transition and determination of its natural linewidth. Physical Review Research. 3(2). 25 indexed citations
14.
Cline, Julia, et al.. (2021). Continuous loading and transport of strontium atoms in a ring cavity. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 1 indexed citations
15.
Barberena, Diego, Robert J. Lewis-Swan, James K. Thompson, & Ana María Rey. (2020). Atom-light entanglement for precise field sensing in the optical domain. Physical review. A. 102(5). 2 indexed citations
16.
Thompson, James K., et al.. (2019). Continuous Real-Time Tracking of a Quantum Phase Below the Standard Quantum Limit. Physical Review Letters. 122(23). 233602–233602. 17 indexed citations
17.
Norcia, Matthew A., Robert J. Lewis-Swan, Julia Cline, et al.. (2018). Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interactions in a strontium superradiant laser. Science. 361(6399). 259–262. 144 indexed citations
18.
Cox, Kevin C., et al.. (2016). Deterministic Squeezed States with Joint Measurements and Feedback. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016. 2 indexed citations
19.
Simon, Jonathan, Haruka Tanji, James K. Thompson, & Vladan Vuletić. (2007). Interfacing Collective Atomic Excitations and Single Photons. Physical Review Letters. 98(18). 183601–183601. 117 indexed citations
20.
Thompson, James K., et al.. (1991). Criteria for Ship Movements in Harbours. 146(22). 3074–3087. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026