James K. Feibleman
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Calvin W. TaylorFrank BarronFrederick SuppeRichard T. LaPiereHelen F. NorthArthur W. BurksWilliam McCordJohn Walker
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers)Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
James K. Feibleman
54 papers receiving 699 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 368
- Cognitive Neuroscience 134
- Social Psychology 132
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 103
- Sociology and Political Science 99
Countries citing papers authored by James K. Feibleman
This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Feibleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Feibleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Feibleman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James K. Feibleman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Feibleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Feibleman. The network helps show where James K. Feibleman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James K. Feibleman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James K. Feibleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James K. Feibleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James K. Feibleman. James K. Feibleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Understanding philosophy : a popular history of ideas | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | The reach of politics : a new look at government | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Mankind behaving : human needs and material culture | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | The pious scientist : nature, God and man in religion | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About James K. Feibleman
James K. Feibleman is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 71 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (45 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (368 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (59 citations). James K. Feibleman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Calvin W. Taylor, Frank Barron, Frederick Suppe, Richard T. LaPiere, Helen F. North, Arthur W. Burks, William McCord, John Walker, Andrew J. Reck and Huntington Cairns. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, American Journal of Psychiatry and American Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.