James J. Verner
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Rheumatology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Haolu WangJohn M. MartellStephen J. IncavoRichard E. WardBruce D. McCarthyMarianne Ulcickas YoodHong WangAaron G. Rosenberg
- Topics
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (11 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (10 papers)Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James J. Verner
17 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Surgery 684
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 67
- Rheumatology 46
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 45
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 42
Countries citing papers authored by James J. Verner
This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Verner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Verner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Verner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Verner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Verner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Verner. The network helps show where James J. Verner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. Verner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. Verner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. Verner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James J. Verner. James J. Verner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 156 | |
| 10 | 155 | |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. | 117 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 74 | |
| 17 | Clinical results of total knee revision using the Total Condylar III prosthesis. | 44 |
About James J. Verner
James J. Verner is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 17 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (11 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (10 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (684 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (45 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (67 citations). James J. Verner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Haolu Wang, John M. Martell, Stephen J. Incavo, Richard E. Ward, Bruce D. McCarthy, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Hong Wang, Aaron G. Rosenberg, Jorge O. Galante and Michael D. Kurdziel. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, American Journal of Roentgenology and Journal of Orthopaedic Research®.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.