William C. Schroer

20 papers receiving 844 citations

Hit Papers

Why Are Total Knees Failing Today? Etiology of Total Knee...20132026201720212013100200300

Peers

William C. Schroer
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Surgery 838
  • Biomedical Engineering 59
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 48
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 43
Replace Randa Elmallah with:
Randa Elmallah United States
Yossef Blum United States
Braden McKnight United States
Craig L. Israelite United States
Timo Puolakka Finland
M. Wiese Germany
Michael Drexler Israel
S. J. Yeo Singapore
David R. Lionberger United States
N. Riand Switzerland
William C. Schroer relative to Randa Elmallah United States Randa Elmallah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Randa Elmallah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Schroer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Schroer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Schroer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Schroer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Schroer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Schroer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Schroer. The network helps show where William C. Schroer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Schroer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Schroer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Schroer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Schroer. William C. Schroer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 14
2 51
3 65
4 30
5 9
6 107
7 16
8 27
9
Why Are Total Knees Failing Today? Etiology of Total Knee Revision in 2010 and 2011breakdown →
316
10 45
11 26
12 15
13 27
14 16
15 5
16
Applicability of the mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty technique: an analysis of 725 cases with mean 2-year follow-up.
6
17 55
18 15
19 17
20
Current concepts on the pathogenesis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
23

About William C. Schroer

William C. Schroer is a scholar working on Surgery, Oral Surgery and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (16 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (14 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (838 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (48 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (43 citations). William C. Schroer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Angela R. LeMarr, Mary E. Reedy, Paul J. Diesfeld, Diane J. Morton, Keith R. Berend, Michael P. Bolognesi, Adolph V. Lombardi, Michael E. Berend, Ryan M. Nunley and C. Lowry Barnes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026