James J. Aimers

36 total papers · 543 total citations
16 papers, 348 citations indexed

About

James J. Aimers is a scholar working on Paleontology, Anthropology and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, James J. Aimers has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 348 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Paleontology, 6 papers in Anthropology and 5 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in James J. Aimers's work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers), Latin American history and culture (5 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers). James J. Aimers is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers), Latin American history and culture (5 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers). James J. Aimers collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. James J. Aimers's co-authors include Prudence M. Rice, David A Hodell, Jaime J. Awe, Terry G. Powis, Julie A. Hoggarth, Christophe Helmke, W. James Stemp, Claire E. Ebert, John E. Douglas and Elizabeth Graham and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Current Anthropology.

In The Last Decade

James J. Aimers

15 papers receiving 318 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
James J. Aimers	281	116	95	91	63	16	348
Timothy W. Pugh	275 1.0×	204 1.8×	93 1.0×	107 1.2×	44 0.7×	33	392
AnnCorinne Freter	271 1.0×	126 1.1×	64 0.7×	118 1.3×	31 0.5×	17	336
Nicholas Tripcevich	233 0.8×	54 0.5×	120 1.3×	153 1.7×	24 0.4×	22	325
Lisa J. LeCount	333 1.2×	163 1.4×	108 1.1×	135 1.5×	17 0.3×	14	393
René Millon	181 0.6×	115 1.0×	33 0.3×	74 0.8×	27 0.4×	23	324
E. Wyllys Andrews	289 1.0×	206 1.8×	96 1.0×	113 1.2×	20 0.3×	28	383
Barbara Fash	243 0.9×	150 1.3×	71 0.7×	82 0.9×	15 0.2×	15	315
Thomas Schreiner	248 0.9×	58 0.5×	51 0.5×	72 0.8×	127 2.0×	10	310
Ian Farrington	137 0.5×	52 0.4×	58 0.6×	62 0.7×	30 0.5×	18	321
Mary Van Buren	200 0.7×	104 0.9×	58 0.6×	180 2.0×	24 0.4×	14	338

Countries citing papers authored by James J. Aimers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Aimers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Aimers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Aimers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James J. Aimers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Aimers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Aimers. The network helps show where James J. Aimers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. Aimers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. Aimers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. Aimers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James J. Aimers. James J. Aimers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact