James Im

33 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

James Im
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 97
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
  • Ophthalmology 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
  • Physiology 148
Replace Michelle Zeidler with:
Michelle Zeidler United States
Abbas Smiley United States
Henrietta Mulnier United Kingdom
Maurizio Rizzi Italy
Tissa Wijeratne Australia
S Ferlito Italy
Esther van ‘t Riet Netherlands
Johnny Wong Australia
Regina Rendas‐Baum United States
Monica M. Vasquez United States
James Im relative to Michelle Zeidler United States Michelle Zeidler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Michelle Zeidler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Im

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Im's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Im with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Im more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Im

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Im. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Im. The network helps show where James Im may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Im, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Im Line = papers co-authored together James Im links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019189
2 201972
3 202250
4 202048
5
Treatment of hypertension with captopril: preservation of regional blood flow and reduced platelet aggregation.
198848
6
Changes in cerebral blood flow and in systemic arterial pressure following spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage.
196846
7 202035
8 201635
9 202332
10 201631
11 202126
12 200925
13 202320
14 202115
15 202214
16 201912
17 202310
18 20229
19 20238
20 20216

About James Im

James Im is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions and Neurology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (97 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 citations), Ophthalmology (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations) and Physiology (148 citations). James Im has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Chow, Brian J. Murray, Mark I. Boulos, Tetyana Kendzerska, Michael Lock, Ya-Ping Jin, Peng Yan, Leonard Chiu, Nicholas Chiu and Jennifer S. Temel. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Survey of Ophthalmology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Neurologic Clinics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact