James Hurley
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Johan SkogMikkel NoerholmD.H. RobertsDaniel EnderleSudipto K. ChakraborttyYu WangXandra O. BreakefieldStephen R. Bloom
- Topics
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers)Extracellular vesicles in disease (3 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Clinical InvestigationJournal of Clinical Oncology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
James Hurley
14 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Molecular Biology 826
- Cancer Research 522
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 256
- Surgery 184
- Biomedical Engineering 138
Countries citing papers authored by James Hurley
This map shows the geographic impact of James Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hurley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Hurley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hurley. The network helps show where James Hurley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Hurley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Hurley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Hurley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Hurley. James Hurley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exosome-based liquid biopsies in cancer: opportunities and challengesbreakdown → | 631 |
| 2 | 171 | |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 252 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 37 |
About James Hurley
James Hurley is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Reproductive Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (3 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (256 citations), Cancer Research (522 citations) and Molecular Biology (826 citations). James Hurley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Johan Skog, Mikkel Noerholm, D.H. Roberts, Daniel Enderle, Sudipto K. Chakrabortty, Yu Wang, Xandra O. Breakefield, Stephen R. Bloom, David M. Smith and Mohammad A. Ghatei. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.