James G. Booth

2.2k citations
20 papers · 1.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

James G. Booth

20 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Resampling-Based Multiple Testing.6871994202620042015200400600

Peers

James G. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Statistics and Probability 354
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 553
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 47
  • Computational Mechanics 243
  • Management Science and Operations Research 146
Replace Ida Ruts with:
Ida Ruts Belgium
Michael Cox United Kingdom
Emily B. Fox United States
George R. Cross United States
Ognjen Arandjelović United Kingdom
Claude Nadeau Canada
Christophe Ambroise France
Jean–Michel Loubes France
Geof H. Givens United States
Yubin Yubin China
James G. Booth relative to Ida Ruts Belgium Ida Ruts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Ida Ruts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James G. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Booth. The network helps show where James G. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James G. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James G. Booth Line = papers co-authored together James G. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20191
2 201836
3 2017205
4 201796
5 20161
6 2016198
7 201418
8 201467
9 20124
10 201220
11
Closed form GLM cumulants and GLMM tting with a SQUAR-EM-LA 2 algorithm.
20111
12 20084
13 20072
14 200117
15 199885
16 19972
17 199512
18
Resampling-Based Multiple Testing.breakdown →
1994687
19 199311
20 199041

About James G. Booth

James G. Booth is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Mechanics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (8 papers), Face recognition and analysis (7 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (7 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (3 papers), Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis (2 papers) and Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (354 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (553 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (47 citations). James G. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter H. Westfall, S. Stanley Young, Stefanos Zafeiriou, Anastasios Roussos, David Dunaway, Allan Ponniah, James P. Hobert, Epameinondas Antonakos, Ronald W. Butler and Yannis Panagakis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Bioinformatics and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026