James Field
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- David M. DoddrellWilliam M. BrooksMichael G. IrvingJ.Mark BulsingIan M. BreretonH BaddeleyGraham J. GallowayStuart Crozier
- Topics
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers)Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (18 papers)NMR spectroscopy and applications (14 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceJournal of the American Chemical SocietyBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
James Field
37 papers receiving 621 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 391
- Spectroscopy 337
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 331
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 107
- Molecular Biology 84
Countries citing papers authored by James Field
This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Field
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Field. James Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Use of high resolution in vivo volume selected 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate leukemia in humans. | 19 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About James Field
James Field is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Biophysics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (18 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (331 citations), Spectroscopy (337 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (391 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David M. Doddrell, William M. Brooks, Michael G. Irving, J.Mark Bulsing, Ian M. Brereton, H Baddeley, Graham J. Galloway, Stuart Crozier, David T. Pegg and M.Robin Bendall. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.