Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by James E. McMahon
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. McMahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. McMahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. McMahon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James E. McMahon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. McMahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. McMahon. The network helps show where James E. McMahon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. McMahon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. McMahon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. McMahon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James E. McMahon. James E. McMahon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lekov, Alex, et al.. (2006). Electricity and Natural Gas Efficiency Improvements for Residential Gas Furnaces in the U.S.. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.2 indexed citations
7.
McMahon, James E., et al.. (2006). Saving Water Saves Energy. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).5 indexed citations
McMahon, James E.. (2004). Comparison of Australian and US Cost-Benefit Approaches to MEPS. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
10.
McMahon, James E., et al.. (2004). Final Rule Technical Support Document (TSD): Energy efficiency standards for consumer products: Clothes washers. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).4 indexed citations
11.
Lekov, Alex, et al.. (2001). Consumer life-cycle cost impacts of energy-efficiency standards for residential-type central air conditioners and heat pumps. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).3 indexed citations
12.
Lutz, James D., et al.. (2001). Technical support document: Energy efficiency standards for consumer products: Residential water heaters. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).6 indexed citations
13.
McMahon, James E., et al.. (2000). Estimating marginal residential energy prices in the analysis of proposed appliance energy efficiency standards. 9.1 indexed citations
Levine, Mark, Jonathan Koomey, James E. McMahon, Alan H. Sanstad, & Eric Hirst. (1995). Energy Efficiency Policy and Market Failures. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 20(1). 535–555.74 indexed citations
18.
McMahon, James E.. (1987). The LBL residential energy model: an improved policy analysis tool. 10(1). 41–71.4 indexed citations
19.
Ruderman, H., Levine, & James E. McMahon. (1984). ENERGY EFFICIENCY CHOICE IN THE PURCHASE OF RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.