James E. Gill

593 citations
23 papers · 473 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Gill

23 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

James E. Gill
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Biophysics 26
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 35
  • Molecular Biology 269
  • Geophysics 36
  • Rheumatology 30
Replace Francesca De Rienzo with:
Francesca De Rienzo Italy
Masahiro Chiba Japan
E. Kuß Germany
Robert S. Ehrlich United States
Xingye Yang China
Melanie R. Nilsson United States
Jung‐Eun Lee South Korea
James Turner United States
G. G. Bishop United States
M. Gałka Poland
James E. Gill relative to Francesca De Rienzo Italy Francesca De Rienzo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Francesca De Rienzo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Gill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Gill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Gill. The network helps show where James E. Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside James E. Gill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Gill Line = papers co-authored together James E. Gill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197359
2 197459
3 198150
4 197544
5 197438
6 196935
7 197226
8 196924
9 197620
10 197617
11 200017
12 197013
13
A comparison of acridine orange and Feulgen cytochemistry of human tumor cell nuclei.
197813
14 19709
15 19719
16 19677
17 19687
18 19576
19 19615
20 19704

About James E. Gill

James E. Gill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (6 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (2 papers) and Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (26 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (35 citations), Molecular Biology (269 citations), Geophysics (36 citations) and Rheumatology (30 citations). James E. Gill has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph A. Mazrimas, M.Leslie Hanna, Robert T. Taylor, Paul K. Horan, Katharine A. Muirhead, Alan S. Waggoner, S. K. Sengupta, Louis J. Cabri, Edward J. Modest and Stephen G. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, Economic Geology, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact