Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
On Economic Inequality
19731.7k citationsJames E. Foster et al.RePEc: Research Papers in Economicsprofile →
Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement
2010356 citationsSabina Alkire, James E. Fosterprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James E. Foster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Foster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Foster. The network helps show where James E. Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Foster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Foster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Foster. James E. Foster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Foster, James E., et al.. (2016). Uso de paneles sintéticos para estimar movilidad intergeneracional. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
5.
Alkire, Sabina, et al.. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis: Chapter 6 - Normative Choices in Measurement Design. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
6.
Alkire, Sabina, James E. Foster, Suman Seth, et al.. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis: Chapter 7 - Data and Analysis. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).3 indexed citations
7.
Alkire, Sabina, James E. Foster, Suman Seth, et al.. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis: Chapter 8 - Robustness Analysis and Statistical Inference. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).3 indexed citations
8.
Alkire, Sabina, James E. Foster, Suman Seth, et al.. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis: Chapter 4 - Counting Approaches: Definitions, Origins, and Implementations. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).2 indexed citations
Foster, James E. & Artyom Shneyerov. (1999). A General Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Foster, James E.. (1998). Absolute versus Relative Poverty.. American Economic Review. 88(2). 335–341.164 indexed citations
16.
Foster, James E.. (1994). Normative measurement: Is theory relevant?. American Economic Review. 84(2). 365–370.10 indexed citations
17.
Foster, James E., et al.. (1994). Statistics, the Law and Government Auditors' Sampling Procedures. 43(1). 35.3 indexed citations
18.
Kvanli, Alan H., et al.. (1992). Warning! Some Misleading Statistical Sampling Formulas. 41(4). 49.
19.
Watson, P. J., Ronald J. Morris, James E. Foster, & Ralph W. Hood. (1986). Religiosity and Social Desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 25(2). 215–215.94 indexed citations
20.
Foster, James E., et al.. (1980). Comparing Utility Functions in Efficiency Terms: Comment. American Economic Review. 70(4). 793–794.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.