James E. Cleaver

1.8k total citations
32 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

James E. Cleaver is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Dermatology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Cleaver has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Dermatology and 8 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in James E. Cleaver's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (10 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (7 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (7 papers). James E. Cleaver is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (10 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (7 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (7 papers). James E. Cleaver collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. James E. Cleaver's co-authors include David L. Mitchell, Deneb Karentz, John H. Epstein, Mohammed Kashani–Sabet, G.H. Thomas, Stanley P. L. Leong, James R. Miller, Suresh Thummala, Donna Coleman and David B. Busch and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

James E. Cleaver

32 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

James E. Cleaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Molecular Biology 617
  • Oncology 302
  • Oceanography 279
  • Cancer Research 248
  • Dermatology 206
Replace Delin Duan with:
Delin Duan China
Tomoko Maruyama Japan
Wonchoel Lee South Korea
Richard R. Jonker Netherlands
Robert Steen United States
Pasquale De Luca Italy
Harold Riethman United States
Gary K. Ostrander United States
James L. Sherley United States
Rhona Stuart United States
Delin Duan China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James E. Cleaver
James E. Cleaver · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James E. Cleaver
James E. Cleaver · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Cleaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Cleaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Cleaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Cleaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Cleaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Cleaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Cleaver. The network helps show where James E. Cleaver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Cleaver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Cleaver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Cleaver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Cleaver. James E. Cleaver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 12
2 14
3 4
4 11
5 6
6 77
7 12
8 164
9 79
10 8
11 8
12 50
13 11
14 3
15 55
16
Evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogens: A report of the international programme on chemical safety's collaborative study on in vivo assays
16
17 26
18 19
19
Value of measurements of DNA repair levels in predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals
3
20 8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026