James E. Campbell

3.5k total citations
98 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

James E. Campbell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Campbell has authored 98 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 37 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in James E. Campbell's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (66 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (31 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (13 papers). James E. Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (66 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (31 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (13 papers). James E. Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Uganda. James E. Campbell's co-authors include Michael S. Lewis‐Beck, John R. Alford, Thomas E. Mann, Kenneth J. Meier, John G. Banwell, Philip D. Marsden, Peter Leonard, I. W. F. Davidson, James C. Garand and J Díaz-Mediavilla and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood and Diabetes.

In The Last Decade

James E. Campbell

94 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. Campbell United States 24 1.4k 581 458 305 246 98 1.8k
Matthew Lebo United States 18 899 0.7× 411 0.7× 464 1.0× 268 0.9× 152 0.6× 38 1.3k
Mary Stegmaier United States 18 1.6k 1.2× 650 1.1× 636 1.4× 336 1.1× 209 0.8× 50 2.0k
Gerald H. Kramer United States 11 1.7k 1.2× 1.5k 2.5× 590 1.3× 290 1.0× 157 0.6× 17 2.4k
Christian Breunig Germany 25 1.3k 1.0× 493 0.8× 562 1.2× 353 1.2× 274 1.1× 64 2.0k
Eric Tanenbaum United Kingdom 7 1.7k 1.2× 290 0.5× 461 1.0× 606 2.0× 182 0.7× 14 2.0k
Andrea Volkens Germany 8 2.2k 1.6× 339 0.6× 564 1.2× 822 2.7× 259 1.1× 15 2.6k
Randolph T. Stevenson United States 21 2.0k 1.5× 802 1.4× 677 1.5× 620 2.0× 254 1.0× 37 2.5k
Douglas W. Rae United States 15 1.7k 1.3× 754 1.3× 686 1.5× 294 1.0× 107 0.4× 29 2.4k
Randall L. Calvert United States 11 1.1k 0.8× 613 1.1× 461 1.0× 340 1.1× 179 0.7× 20 1.5k
Judith Bara United Kingdom 12 2.4k 1.7× 354 0.6× 607 1.3× 838 2.7× 275 1.1× 21 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Campbell. The network helps show where James E. Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Campbell. James E. Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Campbell, James E.. (2018). Explaining Electoral Change in the 2018 US Midterm Elections: The Three Components of Electoral Mandates. The Forum. 16(4). 513–529. 3 indexed citations
2.
Campbell, James E.. (2014). The Republican Wave of 2014: The Continuity of the 2012 and 2014 Elections. The Forum. 12(4). 609–626.
3.
Campbell, James E.. (2014). Issues in Presidential Election Forecasting: Election Margins, Incumbency, and Model Credibility. PS Political Science & Politics. 47(2). 301–303. 1 indexed citations
4.
Campbell, James E.. (2013). The Miserable Presidential Election of 2012: A First Party-Term Incumbent Survives. The Forum. 10(4). 20–28. 6 indexed citations
5.
Campbell, James E., et al.. (2013). Has Growing Income Inequality Polarized the American Electorate? Class, Party, and Ideological Polarization*. Social Science Quarterly. 94(4). 1062–1083. 15 indexed citations
6.
Campbell, James E.. (2012). Forecasting the Presidential and Congressional Elections of 2012: The Trial-Heat and the Seats-in-Trouble Models. PS Political Science & Politics. 45(4). 630–634. 20 indexed citations
7.
Campbell, James E.. (2011). When the Fundamentals are Trumped: The 2008 Wall Street Meltdown Election and Election Forecasting. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
8.
Campbell, James E.. (2008). The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election. PS Political Science & Politics. 41(4). 697–701. 32 indexed citations
9.
Campbell, James E.. (2008). Editor's Introduction: Forecasting the 2008 National Elections. PS Political Science & Politics. 41(4). 679–682. 29 indexed citations
10.
Campbell, James E.. (2006). Forecasting the 2006 National Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives. The Forum. 4(2). 5 indexed citations
11.
Campbell, James E.. (2005). Why Bush Won the Presidential Election of 2004: Incumbency, Ideology, Terrorism, and Turnout. Political Science Quarterly. 120(2). 219–241. 29 indexed citations
12.
Campbell, James E.. (2005). Introduction—Assessments of the 2004 Presidential Vote Forecasts. PS Political Science & Politics. 38(1). 23–24. 14 indexed citations
13.
Campbell, James E.. (2004). Introduction—The 2004 Presidential Election Forecasts. PS Political Science & Politics. 37(4). 733–735. 32 indexed citations
14.
Monagle, Paul, et al.. (2002). Homozygous protein C deficiency: Subcutaneous protein C replacement is effective as salvage or maintenance therapy.. Blood. 100(11). 1022. 3 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, James E.. (2001). Taking Stock of the Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election. American Politics Research. 29(3). 275–278. 7 indexed citations
16.
Campbell, James E.. (1996). Polls and Votes. American Politics Quarterly. 24(4). 408–433. 62 indexed citations
17.
Campbell, James E.. (1991). The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988. The Journal of Politics. 53(2). 477–487. 41 indexed citations
18.
Campbell, James E.. (1987). The Revised Theory of Surge and Decline. American Journal of Political Science. 31(4). 965–965. 59 indexed citations
19.
Campbell, James E.. (1983). The Return of the Incumbents: the Nature of the Incumbency Advantage. The Western Political Quarterly. 36(3). 434–444. 16 indexed citations
20.
Campbell, James E.. (1983). The electoral consequences of issue ambiguity: An examination of the presidential candidates' issue positions from 1968 to 1980. Political Behavior. 5(3). 277–291. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026