James E. Bates

99 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

James E. Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Otorhinolaryngology 156
  • Radiation 79
  • Physiology 168
  • Genetics 59
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 183
Replace Nikhil Gautam Thaker with:
Nikhil Gautam Thaker United States
Joseph P. Valentino United States
Stephanie Mabry Perkins United States
Foppe R. Oldenburger Netherlands
Gianfranco Manneschi Italy
Young Kwok United States
Marianne A. Jonker Netherlands
Emmanuel Désandes France
Richard W.M. van der Maazen Netherlands
Yaacov Richard Lawrence Israel
James E. Bates relative to Nikhil Gautam Thaker United States Nikhil Gautam Thaker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Nikhil Gautam Thaker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Bates. The network helps show where James E. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Bates Line = papers co-authored together James E. Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019111
2 201072
3 200770
4 201465
5 200364
6 201964
7 202355
8 201653
9 201945
10 201538
11 200334
12 202034
13 201932
14 202131
15 202128
16 202328
17 202026
18 202025
19 201723
20 201522

About James E. Bates

James E. Bates is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 116 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (22 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (9 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (7 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (7 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (6 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers) and Brain Metastases and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (156 citations), Radiation (79 citations), Physiology (168 citations), Genetics (59 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (183 citations). James E. Bates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Amdur, Jed E. Rose, Frédérique M. Behm, Michael T. Milano, Louis S. Constine, Eric C. Westman, Sughosh Dhakal, Christopher G. Morris, W. Robert Lee and Akash D. Parekh. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Practical Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Head & Neck and Advances in Radiation Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact