James Di Francesco
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Spectroscopy top 0.5%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes top 5%
- Co-authors
- Philip C. MyersDoug JohnstoneHelen KirkDavid J. WilnerJonathan P. WilliamsTyler L. BourkeT. MackenzieElizabeth Ledwosinska
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (86 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (61 papers)Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (39 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James Di Francesco
85 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.4k
- Spectroscopy 1.1k
- Atmospheric Science 498
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 110
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 109
Countries citing papers authored by James Di Francesco
This map shows the geographic impact of James Di Francesco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Di Francesco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Di Francesco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Di Francesco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Di Francesco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Di Francesco. The network helps show where James Di Francesco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Di Francesco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Di Francesco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Di Francesco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Di Francesco. James Di Francesco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 81 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About James Di Francesco
James Di Francesco is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy and Atmospheric Science, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (86 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (61 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (39 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.4k citations), Spectroscopy (1.1k citations) and Atmospheric Science (498 citations). James Di Francesco has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip C. Myers, Doug Johnstone, Helen Kirk, David J. Wilner, Jonathan P. Williams, Tyler L. Bourke, T. Mackenzie, Elizabeth Ledwosinska, J. K. Jørgensen and Nagayoshi Ohashi. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.