Countries citing papers authored by James D. Absher
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Absher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Absher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Absher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Absher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Absher. The network helps show where James D. Absher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James D. Absher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James D. Absher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James D. Absher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James D. Absher. James D. Absher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kyle, Gerard T., et al.. (2007). A Modified Involvement Scale. Leisure Studies. 26(4). 399–427.215 indexed citations
6.
Vaske, Jerry J., James D. Absher, & Alan D. Bright. (2007). Salient value similarity, social trust and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies. 14(2). 217–226.32 indexed citations
7.
Absher, James D. & Jerry J. Vaske. (2007). Examining the sources of public support for wildland fire policies. 67(1). 35–39.7 indexed citations
Kyle, Gerard T., James D. Absher, & Charles Chancellor. (2005). Segmenting Forest Recreationists Using Their Commitment Profiles. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 23(2).14 indexed citations
Kyle, Gerard T., Alan R. Graefe, & James D. Absher. (2002). Determining Appropriate Prices for Recreation on Public Lands. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 20(2). 69–89.17 indexed citations
13.
Graefe, Alan R., James D. Absher, & Robert C. Burns. (2001). Monitoring visitor satisfaction: a comparison of comment cards and more in-depth surveys. 276.6 indexed citations
14.
Confer, John J., et al.. (2000). Magazines as Wilderness Information Sources: Assessing Users' General Wilderness Knowledge and Specific Leave No Trace Knowledge. 15. 193–197.6 indexed citations
15.
Absher, James D., Daniel W. McCollum, & J.M. Bowker. (1999). The value of research in recreation fee project implementation.. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 17(3). 116–120.6 indexed citations
16.
Absher, James D.. (1998). Customer Service Measures for National Forest Recreation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 16(3).19 indexed citations
17.
Absher, James D., Leo H. McAvoy, Rabel J. Burdge, & James H. Gramann. (1988). Public and Commercial Managers Predicting Recreationist Opinions. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 6(3).6 indexed citations
18.
Burdge, Rabel J., et al.. (1986). The importance of visual environmental quality in site selection for water-based and water-enhanced recreation activities.. 12(3). 41–48.3 indexed citations
19.
Absher, James D.. (1986). When do Community Leaders Align with Client Interests. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 4(4).2 indexed citations
20.
McAvoy, Leo H., James H. Gramann, Rabel J. Burdge, & James D. Absher. (1986). Understanding the Causes of Conflict Between Commercial and Recreational Users of the Mississippi River. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 4(3).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.