Nicholas Page
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Gary HiggsMitchel LangfordGraham MooreSimon MurphyDavid VealePaul M. ŠalkovskisGillian HewittJ. Shepherd
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers)Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryInternational Journal of Epidemiology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Page
34 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Clinical Psychology 113
- General Health Professions 64
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
- Health 50
- Social Psychology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Page
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Page's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Page with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Page more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Page
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Page. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Page. The network helps show where Nicholas Page may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Page
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Page. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Page based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Page. Nicholas Page is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Nicholas Page
Nicholas Page is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Health and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 35 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (43 citations), Health (50 citations) and Clinical Psychology (113 citations). Nicholas Page has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gary Higgs, Mitchel Langford, Graham Moore, Simon Murphy, David Veale, Paul M. Šalkovskis, Gillian Hewitt, J. Shepherd, Simon Moore and G. J. Meléndez‐Torres. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and International Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.