James Chalmers

4.3k citations
37 papers · 3.1k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

James Chalmers

34 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

James Chalmers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 670
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.1k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 864
  • Health 268
  • Family Practice 64
Replace Umesh Kadam with:
Umesh Kadam United Kingdom
Carma Ayala United States
E C Coles United Kingdom
Hsien‐Yen Chang United States
Helle Wallach‐Kildemoes Denmark
B Haglund Sweden
Ronit Calderon‐Margalit Israel
Jong Heon Park South Korea
Kara Nerenberg Canada
Heather Dean Canada
James Chalmers relative to Umesh Kadam United Kingdom Umesh Kadam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Umesh Kadam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Chalmers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Chalmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Chalmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Chalmers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Chalmers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Chalmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Chalmers. The network helps show where James Chalmers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Chalmers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Chalmers Line = papers co-authored together James Chalmers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20144
2 201441
3 201484
4 201221
5 2011228
6 201051
7 20107
8 200978
9 2009285
10 20085
11 200758
12 200660
13 200647
14 200544
15 2005100
16 2003246
17 200218
18 2001161
19 20017
20
An audit of non-insulin-dependent diabetics attending a district general hospital diabetic clinic: implications for shared care between hospital and general practice.
19927

About James Chalmers

James Chalmers is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health Information Management and General Health Professions, having authored 37 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (5 papers), Global Health Care Issues (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (670 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.1k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (864 citations), Health (268 citations) and Family Practice (64 citations). James Chalmers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and France. Frequent co-authors include Adam Redpath, Kate Macintyre, Simon Stewart, John J.V. McMurray, Simon Capewell, Alan Finlayson, James Boyd, Jill P. Pell, David Tappin and S N Jarvis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026