James C. Harkin
- Co-authors
- Judith E. DomerJames G. HamiltonRichard J. ReedPhilip J. DarocaLillian RecantRobert D. TerryLawrence M. RothLeland D. Loose
- Topics
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers)Barrier Structure and Function Studies (3 papers)Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (3 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologySmall AnimalsEpidemiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James C. Harkin
21 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Epidemiology 146
- Neurology 114
- Molecular Biology 111
- Surgery 101
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 67
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Harkin
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Harkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Harkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Harkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Harkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Harkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Harkin. The network helps show where James C. Harkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Harkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Harkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Harkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Harkin. James C. Harkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Tumors of the peripheral nervous system. Supplement | 2 |
| 6 | Benign plexiform schwannoma. a lesion distict from plexiform neurofibroma | 14 |
| 7 | The Mikulicz cell in rhinoscleroma. Light, fluorescent and electron microscopic studies. | 33 |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | Experimental and electron microscopic studies of nerve regeneration. | 8 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Electron microscopic studies of goldfish tumors previously termed neurofibromas ans schwannomas. | 11 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | Pathogenesis of experimental nephrosis electron microscopic observations. | 31 |
| 20 | 48 |
About James C. Harkin
James C. Harkin is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (3 papers) and Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (114 citations), Small Animals (33 citations) and Epidemiology (146 citations). James C. Harkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Judith E. Domer, James G. Hamilton, Richard J. Reed, Philip J. Daroca, Lillian Recant, Robert D. Terry, Lawrence M. Roth, Leland D. Loose, Ernesto O. Hoffmann and Rudolph F. Weichert. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Neurology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.