James C. Fogleman
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Phillip B. DanielsonWilliam T. StarmerWilliam B. HeedPaul Stephen CornRoss MacIntyreTherese A. MarkowHenry W. KircherArnold G. Steigerwalt
- Topics
- Insect behavior and control techniques (15 papers)Botanical Research and Applications (12 papers)Plant and animal studies (10 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesApplied and Environmental MicrobiologyThe American Naturalist
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaDenmark
In The Last Decade
James C. Fogleman
47 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Insect Science 598
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 458
- Molecular Biology 302
- Genetics 253
- Plant Science 244
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Fogleman
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Fogleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Fogleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Fogleman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Fogleman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Fogleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Fogleman. The network helps show where James C. Fogleman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Fogleman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Fogleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Fogleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Fogleman. James C. Fogleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 96 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 87 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About James C. Fogleman
James C. Fogleman is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Pharmacology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (15 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (12 papers) and Plant and animal studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (598 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (458 citations) and Ecological Modeling (57 citations). James C. Fogleman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Phillip B. Danielson, William T. Starmer, William B. Heed, Paul Stephen Corn, Ross MacIntyre, Therese A. Markow, Henry W. Kircher, Arnold G. Steigerwalt, T. V. Orum and D J Brenner. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.