James B. Bakalar
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Toxicology top 1%
- Epidemiology
- Topics
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies (10 papers)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers)Hops Chemistry and Applications (2 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James B. Bakalar
21 papers receiving 775 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Clinical Psychology 405
- Pharmacology 377
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 263
- Toxicology 153
- Epidemiology 115
Countries citing papers authored by James B. Bakalar
This map shows the geographic impact of James B. Bakalar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James B. Bakalar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James B. Bakalar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James B. Bakalar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James B. Bakalar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James B. Bakalar. The network helps show where James B. Bakalar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James B. Bakalar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James B. Bakalar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James B. Bakalar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James B. Bakalar. James B. Bakalar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perception and Knowledge: Reflections on Psychological and Spiritual Learning in the Psychedelic Experience | 3 |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 87 | |
| 4 | Marihuana: la medicina prohibida | 5 |
| 5 | Marihuana, the Forbidden Medicine: Revised and Expanded Edition | 7 |
| 6 | Marihuana as medicine. A plea for reconsideration. | 42 |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 165 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 134 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | The psychedelic drug therapies. | 18 |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | Psychedelic Drugs Reconsidered | 163 |
| 19 | 109 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About James B. Bakalar
James B. Bakalar is a scholar working on Toxicology, Clinical Psychology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (10 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers) and Hops Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (153 citations), Pharmacology (377 citations) and Clinical Psychology (405 citations). James B. Bakalar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lester Grinspoon, David R. Rudy and Michael Winkelman. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.