James A. Richmond
- Genetics top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- M. A. FarquharsonAlan K. FoulisChristine N. LiddleJames AlexanderJames M. BrewerMichael JeffersColin J.R. StewartFoo Y. Liew
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (8 papers)Insect Pheromone Research and Control (5 papers)Plant and animal studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
James A. Richmond
36 papers receiving 956 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Genetics 379
- Surgery 364
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 250
- Molecular Biology 221
- Immunology 199
Countries citing papers authored by James A. Richmond
This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Richmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Richmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Richmond. The network helps show where James A. Richmond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James A. Richmond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James A. Richmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James A. Richmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James A. Richmond. James A. Richmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 134 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | Larch sawfly, Pristiphora erichsonii (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) and its parasitoids from Alaska | 5 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Development of the Nantucket pine tip moth Rhyacionia frustrana (Comstock) under varied photoperiod and crowding conditions on artificial diet. | 1 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Chemical changes in Loblolly Pine, Pinus taeda L., inner bark caused by blue stain fungus, Ceratocystis minor (Hedg.) Hunt. | 3 |
About James A. Richmond
James A. Richmond is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (8 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (250 citations), Genetics (379 citations) and Immunology (199 citations). James A. Richmond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. A. Farquharson, Alan K. Foulis, Christine N. Liddle, James Alexander, James M. Brewer, Michael Jeffers, Colin J.R. Stewart, Foo Y. Liew, Laurence Tetley and A. M. McNicol. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Diabetologia and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.