James A. Ciarlo
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Natalie Sachs‐EricssonDan L. TweedDavid L. ShernFrederick L. NewmanLee A. KirkpatrickDaniel CarpenterRichard DemboJames M. Weyant
- Topics
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment (6 papers)Community Health and Development (6 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James A. Ciarlo
23 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- General Health Professions 141
- Clinical Psychology 119
- Social Psychology 97
- Sociology and Political Science 57
- Psychiatry and Mental health 50
Countries citing papers authored by James A. Ciarlo
This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Ciarlo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Ciarlo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Ciarlo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Ciarlo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Ciarlo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Ciarlo. The network helps show where James A. Ciarlo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James A. Ciarlo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James A. Ciarlo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James A. Ciarlo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James A. Ciarlo. James A. Ciarlo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | |
| 2 | Guidelines for selecting psychological instruments for treatment planning and outcome assessment. | 22 |
| 3 | Criteria for selecting psychological instruments for treatment outcome assessment. | 9 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | The influence of client–clinician demographic match on client treatment outcomes. | 5 |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | Accountability revisited: the arrival of client outcome evaluation. | 15 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Utilizing evaluation : concepts and measurement techniques | 26 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About James A. Ciarlo
James A. Ciarlo is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research and Social Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (6 papers), Community Health and Development (6 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (119 citations), Health (47 citations) and General Health Professions (141 citations). James A. Ciarlo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson, Dan L. Tweed, David L. Shern, Frederick L. Newman, Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Daniel Carpenter, Richard Dembo, James M. Weyant, John J. Berman and Charles Windle. Their work appears in journals such as Sex Roles, Journal of Community Psychology and Evaluation and Program Planning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.