Jake Pensa
Impact in
-
- Soft Robotics and Applications
- Anatomy and Medical Technology
Papers in
-
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 7
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research 2
-
- Soft Robotics and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Ahmad Abiri (6 shared papers)Erik Dutson (6 shared papers)Warren S. Grundfest (4 shared papers)Yen‐Yi Juo (4 shared papers)James W. Bisley (3 shared papers)Jacob Rosén (1 shared paper)Ji Ma (1 shared paper)Yuan Dai (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (2 papers)IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2 papers)Biomedical Microdevices (1 paper)Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics (1 paper)The Journal of Urology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
Jake Pensa
13 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Health Informatics 4
- Biomedical Engineering 133
- Surgery 95
- Cognitive Neuroscience 42
- Human-Computer Interaction 12
Countries citing papers authored by Jake Pensa
This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Pensa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Pensa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Pensa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Pensa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Pensa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Pensa. The network helps show where Jake Pensa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jake Pensa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 1 |
About Jake Pensa
Jake Pensa is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (2 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers) and Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (4 citations), Biomedical Engineering (133 citations), Surgery (95 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (42 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (12 citations). Jake Pensa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ahmad Abiri, Erik Dutson, Warren S. Grundfest, Yen‐Yi Juo, James W. Bisley, Jacob Rosén, Ji Ma, Yuan Dai, Wayne Brisbane and Juan Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Microdevices, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.