Jake Gundrum

739 citations
8 papers · 457 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Neurology top 10%
    • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Papers in

Jake Gundrum

7 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Jake Gundrum
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Infectious Diseases 266
  • Neurology 122
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13
  • Modeling and Simulation 24
Replace Su Aung with:
Su Aung United States
Stella Safo United States
Odaliz Abreu Lanfranco United States
Fan Cheng China
Amit Vahia United States
Martín Ragusa Argentina
Hafsa Abdulla United States
Andrew J Failla Italy
Kelly Malette United States
Carina Dagher United States
Jake Gundrum relative to Su Aung United States Su Aung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Su Aung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Gundrum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Gundrum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Gundrum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Gundrum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Gundrum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Gundrum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Gundrum. The network helps show where Jake Gundrum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jake Gundrum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jake Gundrum Line = papers co-authored together Jake Gundrum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2020314
2 2020125
3 20175
4 20215
5 20184
6 20182
7 19841
8 20181

About Jake Gundrum

Jake Gundrum is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (1 paper), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (266 citations), Neurology (122 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (13 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (24 citations). Jake Gundrum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ning Rosenthal, Zhun Cao, Stella Safo, Michael Klompas, Ahmed Babiker, Sameer S. Kadri, Sarah Warner, Nancy M. Allen LaPointe, Rao Fu and Michael L. Main. Their work appears in journals such as Open Forum Infectious Diseases, JAMA, JAMA Network Open, The American Journal of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact