Jake Epker

403 total citations
9 papers, 264 citations indexed

About

Jake Epker is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Complementary and Manual Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Jake Epker has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 264 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pharmacology, 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Complementary and Manual Therapy. Recurrent topics in Jake Epker's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (3 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers). Jake Epker is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (3 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers). Jake Epker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mongolia and Spain. Jake Epker's co-authors include Robert J. Gatchel, Andrew R. Block, Edward Ellis, Ann Matt Maddrey, Randall L. Rosenblatt, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath and Ryan J. Marek and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, The Journal of the American Dental Association and Journal of Personality Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Jake Epker

9 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jake Epker United States	7	123	114	61	60	55	9	264
Andrew Vitiello Australia	9	86 0.7×	165 1.4×	15 0.2×	40 0.7×	95 1.7×	14	267
Aida Herranz‐Gómez Spain	9	64 0.5×	22 0.2×	59 1.0×	30 0.5×	39 0.7×	19	287
Anna Arnal‐Gómez Spain	10	56 0.5×	26 0.2×	85 1.4×	65 1.1×	59 1.1×	35	297
Jeffrey A. Quon Canada	8	153 1.2×	49 0.4×	19 0.3×	8 0.1×	17 0.3×	16	274
Aleksandar Knežević Serbia	10	165 1.3×	28 0.2×	152 2.5×	91 1.5×	31 0.6×	36	307
Paul S. Nolet Canada	11	253 2.1×	27 0.2×	70 1.1×	28 0.5×	13 0.2×	23	382
Sina Esmaeilzadeh Türkiye	11	124 1.0×	28 0.2×	55 0.9×	48 0.8×	12 0.2×	23	375
Gracia María Gallego‐Sendarrubias Spain	13	139 1.1×	39 0.3×	78 1.3×	56 0.9×	11 0.2×	25	313
Subhash Khatri India	8	75 0.6×	20 0.2×	14 0.2×	20 0.3×	18 0.3×	47	255
Bahar Aras Türkiye	7	143 1.2×	23 0.2×	89 1.5×	12 0.2×	51 0.9×	17	349

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Epker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Epker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Epker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Epker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Epker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Epker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Epker. The network helps show where Jake Epker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jake Epker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jake Epker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jake Epker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jake Epker. Jake Epker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Marek, Ryan J., et al.. (2018). Reliability and Validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2 – Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in Spine Surgery and Spinal Cord Stimulator Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment. 102(1). 22–35. 5 indexed citations

2.

Epker, Jake & Andrew R. Block. (2014). Psychological Screening Before Spine Surgery: Avoiding Failed Surgery Syndrome. Psychological Injury and Law. 7(4). 317–324. 3 indexed citations

3.

Epker, Jake. (2012). Psychometric Methods for Measuring Pain. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 27(1). 30–48. 6 indexed citations

4.

Epker, Jake & Andrew R. Block. (2001). Presurgical Psychological Screening in Back Pain Patients: A Review. Clinical Journal of Pain. 17(3). 200–205. 75 indexed citations

5.

Epker, Jake & Robert J. Gatchel. (2000). Coping Profile Differences in the Biopsychosocial Functioning of Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder. Psychosomatic Medicine. 62(1). 69–75. 62 indexed citations

6.

Epker, Jake & Robert J. Gatchel. (2000). Prediction of treatment-seeking behavior in acute TMD patients: practical application in clinical settings.. PubMed. 14(4). 303–9. 24 indexed citations

7.

Epker, Jake, Ann Matt Maddrey, & Randall L. Rosenblatt. (1999). Pain and Pain-Related Impairment in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 6(4). 393–403. 6 indexed citations

8.

Epker, Jake, Robert J. Gatchel, & Edward Ellis. (1999). A MODEL FOR PREDICTING CHRONIC TMD: PRACTICAL APPLICATION IN CLINICAL SETTINGS. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 130(10). 1470–1475. 77 indexed citations

9.

Epker, Jake & Ann Matt Maddrey. (1998). Quality of Life in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. 4(4). 215–222. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact