Jaime Navarrete

401 citations
35 papers · 234 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jaime Navarrete

29 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Jaime Navarrete
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Clinical Psychology 103
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Applied Psychology 13
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 22
Replace E. D. Kasyanov with:
E. D. Kasyanov Russia
Alessandra Perra Italy
M. van den Heuvel Netherlands
Г. В. Рукавишников Russia
Alexandra Stainton United Kingdom
Veronica Gironi Italy
Hajime Tanabe Japan
Mark Phelan Australia
Anne Malaktaris United States
Carmen Montón-Franco Spain
Jaime Navarrete relative to E. D. Kasyanov Russia E. D. Kasyanov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E. D. Kasyanov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime Navarrete

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime Navarrete's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime Navarrete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime Navarrete more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime Navarrete

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime Navarrete. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime Navarrete. The network helps show where Jaime Navarrete may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaime Navarrete, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaime Navarrete Line = papers co-authored together Jaime Navarrete links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202041
2 202226
3 202122
4 202217
5 202317
6 202115
7 20219
8 20239
9 20219
10 20217
11 20226
12 20216
13 20226
14 20216
15 20244
16 20244
17 20234
18 20243
19 20223
20 20223

About Jaime Navarrete

Jaime Navarrete is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 35 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (17 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (103 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations), Applied Psychology (13 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (31 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (22 citations). Jaime Navarrete has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rosa Baños, Ausiàs Cebolla, Jesús Montero‐Marín, Albert Feliu‐Soler, Juan V. Luciano, Rocío Herrero, José Miguel Soria, Juan Francisco Lisón, Xavier Cortés and Randy Neblett. Their work appears in journals such as Mindfulness, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact