Jaime C. Piñero
- Insect Science top 0.1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Roger I. VargasRonald J. ProkopyLuc LeblancSilvia DornMartı́n AlujaRonald F. L. MauJohn SivinskiNeil W. Miller
- Topics
- Insect behavior and control techniques (73 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (52 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (33 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect SciencePlant ScienceEcology
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoChina
In The Last Decade
Jaime C. Piñero
95 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Insect Science 2.4k
- Plant Science 1.0k
- Ecology 693
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 496
- Molecular Biology 457
Countries citing papers authored by Jaime C. Piñero
This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime C. Piñero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime C. Piñero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime C. Piñero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime C. Piñero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime C. Piñero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime C. Piñero. The network helps show where Jaime C. Piñero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaime C. Piñero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaime C. Piñero. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaime C. Piñero based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaime C. Piñero. Jaime C. Piñero is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | Effectiveness of GF-120 NF Naturalyte Fruit Fly Bait Spray against Different Ages of Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Females When Applied to Border Crops of Various Widths | 8 |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | Feeding history, age and sex influence the response of four economically important Anastrepha species (Diptera: Terphritidae) to human urine and hydrolized protein | 4 |
About Jaime C. Piñero
Jaime C. Piñero is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (73 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (52 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.4k citations), Plant Science (1.0k citations) and Ecology (693 citations). Jaime C. Piñero has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and China. Frequent co-authors include Roger I. Vargas, Ronald J. Prokopy, Luc Leblanc, Silvia Dorn, Martı́n Aluja, Ronald F. L. Mau, John Sivinski, Neil W. Miller, Isabel Jácome and Tracy Leskey. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Animal Behaviour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.