Jae‐Heung Cho
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Physiology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- In‐Hyuk HaKoh‐Woon KimJun‐Hwan LeeYoon Jae LeeMe-riong KimLee JMi‐Yeon SongJoon‐Shik Shin
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (34 papers)Healthcare and Venom Research (30 papers)Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jae‐Heung Cho
95 papers receiving 919 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Pharmacology 386
- Complementary and alternative medicine 307
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 161
- Physiology 146
- Cognitive Neuroscience 108
Countries citing papers authored by Jae‐Heung Cho
This map shows the geographic impact of Jae‐Heung Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jae‐Heung Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jae‐Heung Cho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jae‐Heung Cho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jae‐Heung Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jae‐Heung Cho. The network helps show where Jae‐Heung Cho may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jae‐Heung Cho
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jae‐Heung Cho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jae‐Heung Cho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jae‐Heung Cho. Jae‐Heung Cho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Effects of Far-infrared Therapy on Weight Loss in Korean Obese Women | 3 |
| 20 | Relationship between Depression, Stress and Obesity Indexes in Overweight and Obese Korean Women | 2 |
About Jae‐Heung Cho
Jae‐Heung Cho is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Complementary and alternative medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 114 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (34 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (30 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (88 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (307 citations) and Pharmacology (386 citations). Jae‐Heung Cho has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include In‐Hyuk Ha, Koh‐Woon Kim, Jun‐Hwan Lee, Yoon Jae Lee, Me-riong Kim, Lee J, Mi‐Yeon Song, Joon‐Shik Shin, Byung‐Cheul Shin and Won‐Seok Chung. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.