Jacqueline A-Tjak
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nexhmedin MorinaPaul M.G. EmmelkampMichelle L. DavisMark B. PowersJasper A. J. SmitsMaurice TopperMark R. DixonJonathan B. Bricker
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Jacqueline A-Tjak
7 papers receiving 720 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Clinical Psychology 587
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 271
- Social Psychology 179
- Applied Psychology 127
- Psychiatry and Mental health 92
Countries citing papers authored by Jacqueline A-Tjak
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacqueline A-Tjak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacqueline A-Tjak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacqueline A-Tjak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacqueline A-Tjak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacqueline A-Tjak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacqueline A-Tjak. The network helps show where Jacqueline A-Tjak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacqueline A-Tjak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacqueline A-Tjak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacqueline A-Tjak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacqueline A-Tjak. Jacqueline A-Tjak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Clinically Relevant Mental and Physical Health Problemsbreakdown → | 582 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Het meten van experiëntiële vermijding: De Nederlandstalige versie van de Acceptance and Action Ouestionnaire-II (AAO-II). | 2 |
| 9 | 0 |
About Jacqueline A-Tjak
Jacqueline A-Tjak is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (587 citations), Applied Psychology (127 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (271 citations). Jacqueline A-Tjak has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nexhmedin Morina, Paul M.G. Emmelkamp, Michelle L. Davis, Mark B. Powers, Jasper A. J. Smits, Maurice Topper, Mark R. Dixon, Jonathan B. Bricker, Lance M. McCracken and Louise McHugh. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.