Citations per year, relative to Jacobus M. Oschmann Jacobus M. Oschmann (= 1×)
peers
Harley A. Thronson
Countries citing papers authored by Jacobus M. Oschmann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacobus M. Oschmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacobus M. Oschmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacobus M. Oschmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacobus M. Oschmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacobus M. Oschmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacobus M. Oschmann. The network helps show where Jacobus M. Oschmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacobus M. Oschmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacobus M. Oschmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacobus M. Oschmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jacobus M. Oschmann. Jacobus M. Oschmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clampin, Mark, G. G. Fazio, Howard A. MacEwen, & Jacobus M. Oschmann. (2012). Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave. 8442.232 indexed citations
3.
Oschmann, Jacobus M., Mark Clampin, & G. G. Fazio. (2010). Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2010: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave. 7731.113 indexed citations
4.
Oschmann, Jacobus M., et al.. (2010). Infrared, and Millimeter Wave.10 indexed citations
5.
Oschmann, Jacobus M., et al.. (2006). Space Telescopes and Instrumentation I: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter.35 indexed citations
Hubbard, Robert P. & Jacobus M. Oschmann. (2004). Monte Carlo telescope performance modeling. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5497. 129–129.
Rimmelé, Thomas, S. L. Keil, Christoph U. Keller, et al.. (2003). Technical challenges of the Advanced Technology Solar Telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4837. 94–94.5 indexed citations
Rimmelé, Thomas, Christoph U. Keller, Matthew J. Penn, et al.. (2003). Science Objectives and Technical Challenges of the Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (Invited review). 286. 3.1 indexed citations
d’Orgeville, Céline, Mark Chun, Jacques Sebag, et al.. (1999). <title>Gemini Mauna Kea laser guide star system</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3762. 150–160.6 indexed citations
16.
Mountain, C. M., et al.. (1998). <title>Gemini 8-m telescopes</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3352. 2–13.4 indexed citations
17.
Fletcher, J. M., et al.. (1998). Optical design of Gemini Altair. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3353. 600–600.5 indexed citations
18.
Robertson, David J., et al.. (1994). Adaptive Optics Modeling for the Gemini 8-m Telescopes Project. European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop Proceedings. 48. 121.1 indexed citations
19.
Mountain, C. M., R. Kurz, & Jacobus M. Oschmann. (1994). <title>Gemini 8-m telescopes project</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2199. 41–55.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.