C. M. Mountain
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Atmospheric Science
- Co-authors
- P. J. PuxleyT. J. T. MooreS. K. LeggettH. R. A. JonesT. G. HawardenA. J. LongmoreR. F. JamesonDavid J. Robertson
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (20 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (20 papers)Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
C. M. Mountain
53 papers receiving 632 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 589
- Instrumentation 178
- Spectroscopy 101
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 93
- Atmospheric Science 61
Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Mountain
This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Mountain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Mountain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Mountain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Mountain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Mountain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Mountain. The network helps show where C. M. Mountain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. M. Mountain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. M. Mountain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. M. Mountain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. M. Mountain. C. M. Mountain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | Adaptive Optics Modeling for the Gemini 8-m Telescopes Project | 1 |
| 9 | Automatic On-line Data Analysis for an Infrared Long Slit Array Spectrometer | 1 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | Narrow band 1 mu.m-4 mu.m infrared photometry of 176 stars. | 2 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 59 | |
| 18 | Evaluation of the 1 micron - 5 micron windows at observatory altitudes in the Canary Islands | 0 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About C. M. Mountain
C. M. Mountain is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Spectroscopy, having authored 57 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (20 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (20 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (178 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (589 citations) and Spectroscopy (101 citations). C. M. Mountain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include P. J. Puxley, T. J. T. Moore, S. K. Leggett, H. R. A. Jones, T. G. Hawarden, A. J. Longmore, R. F. Jameson, David J. Robertson, T. G. Hawarden and R. Wade. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.