Jacob M. Howe

484 citations
17 papers · 49 indexed · h-index 6
Topics
Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers)Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

Jacob M. Howe

15 papers receiving 46 citations

Peers

Jacob M. Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
  • Artificial Intelligence 36
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 27
  • Computer Networks and Communications 10
  • Information Systems 10
  • Signal Processing 10
Replace Mate Soos with:
Mate Soos Singapore
Liana Hadarean United States
Diego Figueira France
Larissa Meinicke Australia
Norbert Manthey Germany
Julien Brunel France
Vitaly Lagoon Australia
Joe Hurd United Kingdom
Stefan Göller Germany
David Nowak Japan
Jacob M. Howe relative to Mate Soos Singapore Mate Soos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mate Soos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob M. Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob M. Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob M. Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob M. Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob M. Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob M. Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob M. Howe. The network helps show where Jacob M. Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob M. Howe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob M. Howe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob M. Howe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob M. Howe. Jacob M. Howe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 8
3 5
4 0
5 2
6 6
7 8
8
A Pearl on SAT Solving in Prolog (extended abstract)
1
9 0
10
Closure Algorithms for Domains with Two Variables Per Inequality
1
11
Two Variables per Linear Inequality as an Abstract Domain
1
12 2
13 5
14 1
15 5
16 2
17
Theorem Proving and Partial Proof Search for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Using a Permutation-free Calculus with Loop-Checking
1

About Jacob M. Howe

Jacob M. Howe is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 17 papers that have together received 49 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (10 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (27 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (36 citations). Jacob M. Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Andy King, Edward Robbins, Samir Genaim, Michael Codish and Axel Simon. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Information Processing Letters and Science of Computer Programming.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026